BBN3402SATU2020: MINGGU11 TERJEMAHAN VIDEO(7)

3. Persoalan Kajian/Objektif Kajian (Bab 1). #JomTulisTesis

Bab satu. 1.4. Kalau kita tengok di sini 1.4 persolaan kajian dan objektif kajian 1.5. Jadi kita ambil persoalan kajian. Okay. Jadi persoalan kajian dengan objektif kajian perlulah sejajar. Okay. Perlulah sejajar kerana ia berkaitan. Jadi sekarang ini contoh kita ambil contoh yang ini. Persoalan kajian. Tengok beza sini. “Mengenal pasti wacana tekstual skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu”. Ini objektif dia. “Apakah wacana tekstual skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu?”. Jadi ini kalau misalannya objektif dia dan persoalan dia ada satu. Jadi persoalan dia teruslah. Maknanya kita dah boleh faham dah. Tapi kalau contohnya “Menganalisis kesan skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah” kita boleh jadi dua soalan daripada satu objektif, iaitu “Sejauh manakah kesan skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah rendah?”.“Bagaimanakah pelajar memberi pendapat melalui skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu?”. Jadi kedua-dua soalan ini sebenarnya akan menjawab objektif dua. Kena ingat apa sahaja dalam objektif ini kita memang persoalkan semula sebab kita nak tahu sejauh mana kesan tu. Bagaimana cara dia. Jadi itu akan menjawab objektif ini. Bila kita analisis data ni memang ini akan terjawab. Okay. Serupa juga macam contohnya,“menghasilkan repertoir perbualan melalui animasi cerita rakyat Melayu dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah rendah” yang ini sebenarnya ada temu bual. Temu bual dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah rendah tentang skrip animasi tersebut. Jadi dia bagi pendapat. Persoalan dia “Sejauh mankah repertoir dibina melalui ini ini ini?”. Bagaimana? Dan apakah cara perbualan? Jadi ini terjawablah dalam tu apakah cara perbualan dia? Adakah cara perbualan dia memang berdua atau bertiga atau berempat ataupun memang dia seorang. Tapi nak kata dia seorang, nak berbual dengan siapa pula. Okay. Mungkin dengan penyelidik. Soalan ketiga, “Apakah kategori repertoir?”. Okay. Jadi maknanya dia hasilkan repertoir ada tiga soalan di sini. Sejauh manakah? Apakah cara perbualan? Apakah kategori dia? Memang setelah itu nanti bila kita menganalisis data, memang kita akan dapati terjawablah soalan ketiga-tiga ini. Jadi, bukanlah semestinya satu objektif, satu. Boleh juga satu objektif, tiga soalan tapi sebenarnya bila kita analisis data memang akan terjawab tiga-tiga soalan ini. Macam yang nombor dua, analisis kesan skrip animasi akan ada dua persoalan. Bila kita analisis memang ohh lah memang kita jawablah dua soalan ini. Kita dapati bahawa memang kita jawab dua soalan ini. Bila yang objektif satu, “mengenal pasti wacana tekstual” memang kita ada satu contohnya. Boleh juga nak buat dua tapi kita tengoklah cara kita analisis data tu terjawab tak soalan ni. Bila kita buat analisis kita tengok balik soalan. Terjawab tak? Jadi bila dah terjawab tu memang betullah. Jadi janganlah kita letak ketiga-tiga objektif atau semua dua-dua objektif ada satu sahaja persoalan. Jadi, kita boleh letak dua atau tiga. Kadang-kadang ada pelajar letak sampai empat sebab dia nak pastikan bahawa bila dia analisis data tu memang terjawab empat-empat soalan tersebut. Kalau contohnya, “Menghasilkan buku panduan penulisan skrip animasi cerita rakyat”. Contohnya kalaulah pelajar tu buat ada empat objektif. Jadi sejauh manakah skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu dihasilkan. Apakah cara untukmenghasilkan buku panduan penulisan skrip animasi cerita rakyat. Jadi, yang ini memang ini akan jadi kebaharuan. Nombor tiga kebaharuan, nombor empat kebaharuan bagi awak punya tesis. Benda baharu yang kita nak sebarkan ke seluruh dunia. Jadi yang ini kita akan ada dua persolan di sini. Sejauh manakah buku panduan dihasilkan? Apakah cara dia? Jadi bila buat ini memang kita pastikan bila kita analisis data kita pastikan kita jawab dua-dua soalan ini. Jadi bila kita nak tulis objektif, kita pastikan kita persoalkan. Apa benda yang kita akan dapati bila kita analisis data nanti. Adakah ini? Adakah itu? Jadi sebab itulah kita ada beberapa soalan untuk satu objektif. Ini ada dua soalan satu objektif. Ini ada tiga soalan. Ini ada ini. Tapi soalan dia memang berkisarkan tentang objektif ini tadi tak lari. Tak lari. Tetapi memang sebagai penyelidik yang bagus memang dia akan persoalkan supaya nanti bila kita, macam ini “Dibina repertoir” “Sejauhmana reperoir dibina?”, “Apakah cara perbualan dia?” cara perbualan tu kita kena huraikanlah. “Apakah kategori?” sebab kita nak kategorikan repertoir tersebut untuk objektif ketiga ini. Jadi kita pastikan kita jawab semua soalan ini. Jadi pelajar semua harap, bila kita dah lihat apakah objektif kita, kita pastikan persoalan kita tu menjawab persoalan melalui objektif kita. Dan kita perlu pastikan bahawa semula saya katakan bahawa apa yang kita analisis itu akan terjawablah soalan-soalan yang kita tanya pada diri kita persoalan ini. Dan pemeriksa bila dia baca ohh okay soalan dia begini memang saya dapati ada dalam bab 4. Okay kita dapati bahawa pelajar memang tulis kategori repertoir itu dan bahagian repertoir bermakna memang tesis ini berjaya sebab dia boleh menjawab persoalan daripada objektif yang dia cadangkan untuk tesis dia. Jadi pastikan bahawa 1.4 persoalan kajian, 1.5 objektif. Perkataan ini yang diambil ini seperti ini mengenal pasti, menganalisis, menghasilkan. Ini ada dalam sini kalau kita dapat lihat awak kena pastikan bahawa objektif satu yang awak pilih itu perlulah dari kalau kita lihat di sini, sekejap, saya ada cadangkan. Ia di sini. Cadangan senarai kata kerja. Ini ya. Kata kerja operasional taksonomi Bloom. Jadi, kita pastikan objektif satu tu rendah. Okay. Kalau C1 tu dia rendah. Rendah. Macam tadi mengenal pasti tu ada. Mengenal pasti ada. Kemudian bila objektif dua kita nak analisis kenalah tinggi. Kita tengoklah mana bersesuaian. Kita baca dulu. Yang mana bersesuain untuk objektif kedua. Kalau untuk aplikasi apa dia? Untuk analisis apa dia? Ini tadi kita pilih untuk objektif kedua analisis. Itu dah tinggi dah C4 maknanya memang kita analisis secara mendalam. Secara mendalam ya. Kemudian kita nak letak meghasilkan tu kita letak C6. Kita nak hasilkan tadi kan. Ingat takkita nak hasilkan repertoir ataupun kita nak hasilkan buku panduan apa ke. Ini perkataan-perkataan dia. Ini pastikan bahawa objektif satu janganlah awak ambil C5, awak nak nilai tiba-tiba objektif dua rendah pula awak masuk mengenal pasti dah salah. Dia mesti daripada kecil, daripada mudah ini hinggalah kita naik naik sehinggalah ke C6. C6. Jadi pastikan pemilihan perkataan-perkataan ini bersesuaian objektif bersesuain dan juga ikut tahap dia rendah ke tinggi. Objektif satu rendah,objektif dua tinggi sikit, objektif tiga lagi tinggi. Janganlah objektif satu rendah, objektif dua awak letak okay tinggi betul C6 tadi kemudian objektif 3 ohh turun pula balik. Salah. Kena ikut tingkat macam kita naik tangga. Rendah naik naik. Jadi ambil daripada sini. Pastikan bahawa perkataan itu bersesuaian dengan objektif kita. Jadi kena besesuai. Dan lagi satu. Lagi satu bila kita tulis objektif ini contoh mengenal pasti, ada pula pelajar nombor dua mengenal pasti juga kemudian nombor tiga mengenal pasti lagi, nombor empat mengenal pasti. Dah empat-empat mengenal pasti. Jadi itu tak boleh. Itu semuanya tahap yang rendah. Tahap yang rendah ni tidak bersesuaian asyik nak mengenal pasti je. Dah kenapa kan? Kita nak lah juga analisis. Jadi tak boleh. Jadi macam ini saya bagi contoh kalau dia buat empat objektif. Biasanya objektif ada tiga sahaja. Kalau ada empat pun, kalau ini hasil repertoir, ini buku panduan ini berbeza. Jadi bolehlah dia nak tukar. Contohnya, menghasilkan, jadi dia boleh nak tukar. Kalau kita tengok sini dia ada banyak. Kita ada mengatur, mengkategorikan, menyusun, membangun. Ada banyaklah. Merencana, merumuskan pun boleh. Kita letak ini merumus. Jadi kalau ini dah misalnya C6, bolehlah C6 ini C6 yang ini. Jadi boleh rujuk dalam buku ini kalau tiada pun bolehlah rujukdalam internet. Kalau jumpa. Okay. Pastikan ye, ingat saya katakan tadi. Saya ulang balik. Pastikan kategori dia mesti daripada rendah kemudian tinggi sikit kemudian tinggi lagi supaya nampak dia punya perbezaan. Cara kita nak menganalisis data tersebut. Jadi pemilihan perkataan ni amat penting dalam penulisan objektif kajian.

TERJEMAHAN BAHASA INGGERIS

3.Research Questions/Research Objectives (Chapter 1). #JomTulisTesis

Chapter one. 1.4. If we look here 1.4 study questions and study objectives 1.5. So we take the research question. Okay. So the research questions with the research objectives need to be aligned. Okay. Must be aligned as it relates. So now this is an example we take this example. Research questions. Look at the difference here. "Identifying the textual discourse animation script Malay folklore". This is the objective. "What is the textual discourse Malay folklore animation script?". So this is if for example his objective and the question he has one. So the question he continues. That means we can already understand. But if for example "Analyzing the effect of animation script Malay folklore among schoolchildren" we can be two questions from one objective, which is "To what extent the effects of animation script Malay folklore among elementary school students?"."How do students give opinions through animation script Malay folklore?". So these two questions will actually answer objective two. We have to remember that in this objective we really question again because we want to know the extent of the effect. How is he. So that will answer this objective. If we analyze this data, this will be answered. Okay. A similar kind of example, "generate conversation through animation repertoire Malay folklore among primary school students" who actually have an interview. Interviews among primary school students about the animated script. So he shared his opinion. His question is "How far is the repertoire built through this and this?". How? And what is the way of conversation? So this is answered in tu what is the way he talks? Is the way he talks really two or three or four or is he really one. But I want to say he is alone, I want to talk to anyone. Okay. Probably with researchers. The third question, "What is the category of repertoire?". Okay. So that means he produced a repertoire there are three questions here. How far? What is the way of conversation? What is her category? Indeed, after that when we analyze the data, we will find that these three questions are answered. So, it is not necessarily one objective, one. It can also be an objective, three questions but in fact when we analyze the data will be answered these three questions. As with number two, the analysis of the effects of animated scripts will have two questions. When we analyze it, ohh, we do answer these two questions. We find that we do answer these two questions. When the objective is one, "identify textual discourse" we do have an example. You can also want to do two, but let's see how we analyze the data, this question is not answered. When we do an analysis we look back at the question. Did you answer? So when it is answered, it is true. So let us not put all three objectives or all two objectives have only one question. So, we can put two or three. Sometimes there are students who put up to four reasons he wants to make sure that when he analyzes the data, the four questions are answered. For example, "Produce a guidebook for writing animated scripts of folklore". For example, if the student makes four objectives. So to what extent the animation script generated Malay folklore. What is the way to produce a folktale animated script writing guidebook. So, this one is indeed going to be a novelty. Number three novelty, number four novelty for you have a thesis. New things we want to spread all over the world. So this one we will have two questions here. To what extent is the handbook produced? What is her way? So when we do this we make sure when we analyze the data we make sure we answer these two questions. So when we want to write an objective, we make sure we ask questions. What will we find when we analyze the data later. Is this? Is that? So that is why we have several questions for one objective. Here are two questions one objective. Here are three questions. Here it is. But his question really revolved around this objective did not run away. Do not run. But as a good researcher, he will question so that later when we, like this "Built repertoir" "How far is the reperoir built?", "What is the way he talks?" We have to explain that way of conversation. "What is a category?" because we want to categorize the repertoire for this third objective. So we make sure we answer all these questions. So students all hope, when we have seen what our objectives are, we make sure our questions answer the questions through our objectives. And we need to make sure that again I say that what we analyze will answer the questions we ask ourselves this question. And the examiner when he read ohh okay his question is like this I did find it in chapter 4. Okay we find that the student did write the repertoire category and the repertoire section means indeed this thesis is successful because he can answer the questions from the objectives he proposed for his thesis. So make sure that 1.4 research questions, 1.5 objectives. This word is taken as it identifies, analyzes, produces. This is in here if we can see you have to make sure that the objective one you choose should be from if we see here, for a moment, I have a suggestion. It's here. Suggested verb list. Here it is. Bloom's taxonomic operational verbs. So, we make sure the objective one is low. Okay. If C1 is low. Low. Like just identifying that there is. Identify there. Then when the two objectives we want to analyze must be high. Let's see where it fits. We read first. Which is appropriate for the second objective. If for what application is he? For what analysis is? This we just chose for the second objective of the analysis. That is already high, C4 means that we have in-depth analysis. In depth yes. Then we want to put produce then we put C6. We want to produce just now, right? Remember we do not want to produce a repertoire or we want to produce a guidebook. These are her words. This makes sure that objective one you do not take C5, you want to suddenly value objective two low then you go in identify wrong. He must be from small, from this simple until we go up and down to C6. C6. So make sure the selection of these words matches the appropriate objectives and also follow his level low to high. Objective one low, objective two slightly higher, objective three more high. Don't let objective one be low, objective two you put okay high right C6 earlier then objective 3 ohh go down again. Wrong. Have to follow the level like we went up the stairs. Low ups and downs. So take it from here. Make sure that the word fits our objective. So be careful. And one more. Another is when we write this objective example of identifying, there are students number two identify also then number three identify again, number four identify. The four have identified. So that can't be. That's all low level. This low level is not suitable for fun to identify. Why? We also want analysis. So you can't. So like this I give an example if he makes four objectives. Usually there are only three objectives. If there are four, if this is the result of the repertoire, this guidebook is different. So maybe he wants to change. For example, produce, so he can want to change. If we look here he has a lot. We have to organize, categorize, organize, build. There are many. Planning, formulating is also possible. We put this formulated. So if this is for example C6, this C6 can be this C6. So you can refer to this book if there is none, you can refer to the internet. See you. Okay. Make sure ye, remember I said earlier. I repeat. Make sure his category must be from low then high a little then high again so that it looks like he has a difference. The way we want to analyze the data. So the choice of words is very important in writing the objectives of the study.

 

Rujukan:

Prof. Dr Normaliza Abd Rahim. (2020). 3. Persoalan Kajian/Objektif Kajian (Bab1).  #JomTulisTesis. Diakses pada Januari 8, 2021 melalui pautan https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTV4bXMeYcw&t=56s

Saya sudah subscribe! Anda bila lagi☺☺☺

KERJA KUMPULAN:

Gambar Bukti Kehadiran Minggu 11

BBN3402SATU2020: MINGGU11 TERJEMAHAN VIDEO(6)

4. Batasan Kajian (Bab 1). #JomTulisTesis

Jadi kita sambung dalam bab 1, kita ada 1.7 iaitu batasan kajian. Yang ini juga pelajar selalu buat silap ataupun dia terlupa nak letak. Jadi biasanya, kalau saya cadangkan dalam penulisan batasan kajian, mulanya awak boleh buat dalam bentuk jadual. Okay dalam bentuk jadual. Jadi ini batasan dia. Yang ini justifikasi. Batasan kajian ini ialah kita nak menyatakan apa justifikasi. Kenapa kita pilih sampel itu? Kenapa kita pilih instrumen itu? Kenapa kita buat soal selidik? Jadi kita kena letak. Contohnya kita letak batasan 20 pelajar. 20 pelajar SK Serdang. Contoh dia. Okay. Jadi beri justifikasi. Kenapa awak pilih 20 pelajar ini. Okay. 20 pelajar tadi awak pilih pula 9 tahun. Okay. Kenapa awak pilih? Kenapa awak pilih pelajar 20 pelajar daripada SK Serdang? Jadi kalau jumlah dia, kenapa 20? Kenapa tak 30? Kenapa tak 21? Kenapa tak 19? Beri justifikasi. Kemudian, kenapa SK Serdang? Kalau SK Serdang awak nak letak yang kedua boleh. Kenapa SK Serdang? Jadi nyatakan. Kenapa tak sekolah dekat Perlis? Kenapa bukan sekolah dekat Terengganu. Jadi awak kena beri justifikasi kenapa sekolah ini. Kemudian ada lagi. Kenapa. Apa pemilihan awak punya. Biasanya batasan kajian awak ni daripada awak ambil daripada metodologi. Okay. Daripada metodologi tentang dia punya sampel ataupun dia punya responden. Lokasi kajian ataupun awak pakai buku. Buku teks bahasa Melayu tingkatan 5. Kenapa? Kenapa pilih itu? Beri justifikasi. Okay. Dalam justifikasi ini awak boleh letak ayat awak justifikasi. Kemudian letaklah misalnya awak ada rujukan yang si Normaliza Abd Rahim, 2019 mengatakan bahawa ini ini ini. Dia katakan bahawa memang boleh 20 pelajar. Ini contoh ya. Jadi awak letak justifikasi. Kenapa pemilihan SK Serdang menurut Menteri Pendidikan contohnya SK Serdang merupakan sekolah luar bandar yang sekian sekian sekian. Jadi itu awak letak. Tapi ini ringkas ya dalam justifikasi kerana ini jadual. Jadual berapa. Ini apa nama justifikasi. Kemudian awak huraikan pula, sekarang ini. Ini dah tulis dalam bentuk jadual. Ini ambil daripada metodologi apa dia. Kalau awak kata awak pakai temu bual. Temu bual secara ini. Kenapa justifikasi itu. Dia benda-benda ini perlu ada justifikasi. Kadang-kadang ada orang tak letak sebab dah memang tahu buat temu bual apa semua. Tak perlu letak. Ini yang penting ialah siapa sampel dia, kenapa umur 9 tahun? Kenapa lokasi itu dekat situ? Kenapa tak buat dekat negeri lain? Kenapa tak buat dekat Korea? Contoh dia. Jadi kena ada justifikasi dia. Kemudian bila sini, jadual berapa di atas. Okay. Awak buat huraian. Huraian huraian. Huraikan satu-satu beserta dengan ulang ayat ini dengan ayat panjang. Beri justifikasi kenapa pemilihan 20 pelajar? Kenapa SK Serdang? Jadi hurai dengan lebih jelas lagi. Dengan lebih panjang lebar lagi. Supaya tidak ada persoalan daripada pemeriksa. Katakan nanti bila dia tengok analisis data ataupun bab 3, 20. Awak tak kata pun dalam batasan kajian awak pilih 20. Boleh ke 20? Mulalah. Sebenarnya cerita pasal pelajar saja. Soalan yang ditanya oleh pemeriksa adalah 20 soalan tentang pelajar saja. Memang masa itu terkedu tak boleh nak jawab soalan. Jadi bila dah ada sini, pemeriksa baca balik, tengok balik jadual. “Oh saya faham, kenapa dia buat begini”. Dah ada justifikasi ini. Contohnya kenapa. Ni ada. Novel bertajuk novel Salina. Kenapa novel Salina. Kenapa tak novel yang ada beratus, berapa ribu kat pasaran dekat DBP. Jadi awak boleh justifikasi kenapa novel Salina ini kerana memenangi. Ini contoh ya. Memenangi anugerah bla bla. Ataupun menjadi buku teks tingkatan 5 pada tahun sekian sekian. Jadi awak letaklah justifikasi itu kerana apa. Dan pastikan justifikasi yang awak letak berdasarkan batasan ini memang justifikasi yang menyerlah. Sebab contohnya, ada pelajar dia buat tentang majalah. Majalah A contoh dia. Lepastu saya tanya. Saya tanya kenapa awak pilih majalah A. Kemudian pelajar jawab dalam justifikasi saya dah tulis bahawa majalan A telah memenangi sekian sekian sekian pada tahun sekian sekian. Bolehlah. Bolehlah kita ambil sebagai itu. Contohnya yang lain tentang cerpen. Cerpen yang diambil pada tahun 2000. Contoh 2015 hingga ini. Cerpen itu ambil daripada majalah sekian sekian sekian. Jadi mungkinlah justifikasi dia mungkin ialah dia memenangi anugerah juga. Jadi bolehlah dia ambil situ. Justifikasi ini mesti perkara yang penting yang menyebabkan kenapa awak memilih. Pilih bahan itu. Kenapa awak pilih sampel itu? Kenapa umur ini? Jadi semua itu perlu ada justifikasi dalam bentuk jadual. Kemudian buat huraian di bawah ini. Supaya ia lebih jelas. Bila lebih jelas, ia memang tidak ada persoalan daripada pemeriksa. Dan juga dalam ini jangan lupa kita kena ada penanda wacana. Supaya kita nampak sebagai penulisan akademik. Itu amat penting ya. Jangan lupa tentang batasan kajian.

TERJEMAHAN INGGERIS:

4. Limitations of the Study (Chapter 1).  #Let'sWriteAThesis

So we continue in chapter 1, we have 1.7 which is the limitation of the study. This one also the student always makes mistakes or he/she forgets to put it. So usually, if I suggest in writing the limitations of the study, at first you can do it in tabular form. Okay in tabular form. So this is his/her limitation. This is justification. The limitation of this study is that we want to state what the justification is. Why did we choose that sample? Why did we choose that instrument? Why do we do questionnaires? So we have to put it down. For example, we place a limit of 20 students. 20 students of Serdang Primary School. An example. Okay. So justify. Why did you choose these 20 students. Okay. The 20 students you chose were 9 years old. Okay. Why did you choose? Why did you choose 20 students from Serdang Primary School? So if examiner asked, why 20? Why not 30? Why not 21? Why not 19? Justify. Then, why Serdang Primary School? If Serdang Primary School you want to put the second you can. Why Serdang Primary School? So state. Why not go to school in Perlis? Why not a school in Terengganu. So you have to justify why this school. Then there is more. Why. What choice do you have. Usually the limitations of your study are taken from the methodology. Okay. From the methodology about having a sample or has a respondent. The location of the study or you use a book. Form 5 Malay Textbooks. Why? Why choose that? Justify. Okay. In this justification you can put your sentence justification. Then put for example you have a reference that Normaliza Abd Rahim, 2019 says that this is this. She said that it is possible for 20 students. Here is an example. So you have a justification. Why the election of Serdang Primary School, according to the Minister of Education for example Serdang Primary School is a rural school. So that's why you choose it. But this is simple, in justification because this is stated in table. Tables. This is what the name of the justification is. Then you explain it, right now. This is written in tabular form. This taken from what methodology is. If you say you use an interview. Interview in this way. What is th justification. These things need justification. Sometimes there are people who do not put it because they already know how to interview everyone. Then no need to place it. The important thing is who sampled him, why is he 9 years old? Why is the location so close? Why not make it in another country? Why not make it in Korea? An example. So there must be a justification for it. Then when here, shown on table above. Okay. You make a description. Description description. Explain one by one along with repeating this sentence with a long sentence. Justify why the selection of 20 students? Why Serdang Primary School? So explain more clearly. With even longer width. So that there is no question from the examiner. Tell me later when examiner looks at the data analysis or chapters 3, 20. “You did not even say in the limits of the study that you chose 20. Can it be 20?” Get started. Actually, the story is about students only. The questions asked by the examiner are 20 questions about students only. Indeed, at that time you was stunned and could not answer the question. So when you are here, the examiner reads back, looks back at the schedule. "Oh I understand, why did he/she do this". There is already this justification. For example why. There is no question. The novel is titled novel titled “Salina”. Why novel titled “Salina”. Why not have hundreds of others novel, how many thousands in the market in DBP. So you can justify why this novel titled “Salina” is for winning. Here is an example. Winning the blah blah award. Or become a form 5 textbook in so many years. So you put that justification for what. And make sure the justification you place based on this limitation is indeed a clear justification. Because for example, there are students made about magazines. Magazine A for example. Then I asked. I asked why you chose magazine A. Then the student answered in my justification I wrote that magazine A has won so many years over the years. Not bad. Let's take it as it is. Another example is a short story. Short stories taken in 2000. Examples of 2015 to date. The short story is taken from so a magazine. So maybe his justification might be that it won the award as well. So let him take it. This justification must be the important thing that causes you to choose. Select the material. Why did you choose that sample? Why this age? So all that needs to be justified in the form of a table. Then create a description below. So that it is clearer. When it is clearer, it is indeed no question from the examiner. And also in this, do not forget we have to have discourse markers. So that we see it as academic writing. That is very important. Do not forget about the limitations of the study.

 

Rujukan:

Prof. Dr Normaliza Abd Rahim. (2020). 4. Batasan Kajian (Bab 1). #JomTulisTesis.  Diakses pada Januari 8, 2021 melalui pautan https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oywLQj4vNXM

Saya sudah subscribe! Anda bila lagi☺☺☺

KERJA KUMPULAN:

Gambar Bukti Kehadiran Minggu 11

BBN3402SATU2020: MINGGU11 TERJEMAHAN VIDEO(5)

12. Menulis Artikel untuk Terbitan Dalam Jurnal. Jom Tulis Tesis. 

Okay jom kita tulis artikel. Biasanya pelajar master atau pelajar PhD diwajibkan untuk menulis artikel untuk terbitan. Jadi saya boleh ajar serba ringkas ya bagaimana kita nak tulis artikel yang baik yang boleh kita terbitkan. Jadi, pada pelajar yang belum pernah terbit dia akan rasa banggalah. Biasanya artikel dalam jurnal atau bab dalam buku, biasanya hampir sama. Jadi kita ada disini, kita ada tajuk, tajuk mestilah yang menarik ya yang menarik sehingga orang nak baca artikel kita. Kita sertakan abstrak, abstrak kita terpulang kepada jurnal tersebut yang mempunyai berapa patah perkataan kadang-kadang antara 250 hingga 300. Kemudian ada pengenalan, ada sorotan kajian. Sorotan kajian ni terpulang kepada penulis masing-masing. Kadang-kandang dia tak letak perkataan sorotan kajian, dia letak tajuk macam contoh ‘Animasi Cerita Rakyat’, dia letak tu dalam tu merupakan sorotan. Kemudian ada metodologi, keputusan dan perbincangan, kesimpulan, dan rujukan. Bukan bibliografi dah ia rujukan. Jadi, dalam yang ini kita mula-mula fokus kepada tajuk, tajuk tu kenalah menarik, biasanya tajuk tu kalau jurnal ke artikel ke biasanya tak boleh lebih daripada 20 patah perkataan. Jadi abstrak ini kita kalau tulis dalam bahasa Melayu kita tulis abstrak bahasa Melayu disertakan dengan abstrak bahasa Inggeris supaya ia lebih jelas. Dalam abstrak ini kita akan letak macam contohnya ayat lebih kurang lima ayat, empat atau lima ayat macam ayat mukadimah la ni. Mukadimah ni contohnya kita letak seperti latar belakang dan juga masalah yang dihadapi, masalah kajian sehingga timbulnya kita nak buat yang ini. Ayat ini diikuti dengan ayat objektif, kemudian ada metodologi. Metodologi ini kita kena letak la kalau ada sampel-sampel dan seterusnyalah sampai lokasi, kalau tak de tak payah letak macam tu. Lokasi kemudian semualah sehingga ke teori. Prosedur kena ada, cara analisis macam mana, analisis kena ada, kemudian daripada huraian kat sini kita letakkan kita punya keputusan, keputusan kajian kita tu kita letak dalam abstrak ni lah. Kita letak keputusan dan ayat akhir kita akan letak apa yang awak harapkan dalam kajian akan datang. Diharapkan kajian akan datang akan memberi fokus kepada apa dia, apa dia, apa dia. Ayat akhir mesti ada. Kemudian disertai dengan kata kunci. Okay kata kunci biasanya ada lima, kata kunci ada lima. Dan diteruskan dengan pengenalan. Biasanya pengenalan ini awak boleh letak dalam lebih kurang ya lah kita nak memperkenal ni kita letaklah kita punya latar belakang, kita nak ceritalah tentang apa nama ciri-ciri apa benda yang berkaitan dengan tajuk kita tu tadi. Jadi pengenalan ini kadang-kadang awak letak dalam satu perenggan, ini agak penting ya kerana ada jurnal yang dia sangat-sangat pertaturan dia sangat ketat ya. Pengenalan ni adalah orang, ada orang letak dalam bentuk sorotan pula dalam tu. Jadi itu yang kena reject. Jadi terpulang kepada jurnal yang ada lah, terpulang. Baca balik apa arahan yang diberi. Yang satu perenggan ni letak macam latar belakang tersebut. Kemudian masuk yang sorotan. Jadi ini satu perenggan ya. Sorotan tu tadi macam saya kata, awak boleh letak perkataan sorotan kajian ataupun awak boleh letak tajuk dia macam contohnya ‘Animasi Cerita Rakyat’, boleh antara dua, jadi sorotkan. Yang ini awak letak dalam empat perenggan, okay letak dalam empat perenggan yang mempunyai sorotan kajian lima tahun kebelakang sahaja. Okay, lima tahun kebelakang, dan juga perlu kritis. Jangan, macam yang saya ajar dalam Bab 2, kalau tak kritiskan, dia berdiri dengan sendiri je tak boleh macam tu. Maknanya, letak yang kritis. Maknanya bila huraian dalam satu perenggan tu ada satu nama, kemudian sokonglah dengan kajian-kajian yang lain, selari ke, hampir sama ke, sokong ke, letak kat situ. Juga letak yang negatif juga yang seperti ‘kajian ini, kajian Normaliza Abd Rahim, 2019 didapati tidak bersetuju dengan kajian yang dijalankan oleh ni, ni, ni, ni”, letakkan kepada dia tak setuju tu. Kena, itu namanya kritis mencari persamaan dan perbezaan. Okay ini dah empat perenggan dah, sebelum habis je daripada sorotan kajian itu ada ayat objektif. Ayat objektif ya, bukan satu subtopik. Biasanya ayat sahaja, dalam satu ayat iaitu justeru kajian ini ialah justeru daripada sorotan, masalah kajian ni semua ada jurang penyelidikan ya. Dalam sini semua ada jurang penyelidikan. Jadi, justeru kajian ini ingin mengenal pasti dan membincangkan apa dia, apa dia, apa dia, apa dia, satu ayat je. Jadi ini satu ayat, iaitu selepas sorotan kajian. Maknanya ini dah perenggan lain, ini perenggan baru. Jadi ini perenggan lainlah. Okay perenggan lain. Jadi perenggan tu ada satu je ayat. Kemudian terus masuk tajuk metodologi. Metodologi ini awak kena lengkapkanlah semua yang ada kat dalam metodologi awak huraikan. Awak kena huraikan macam sebiji yang ada dalam tesislah. Ada sampel, ada lokasi, ada prosedur, ada analisis, ada bahan, kalau misalnya ada bahan tu awak kena letak pulak sinopsis bahan, iya lah sinopsis novel contoh dia, sinopsis cerpen contohnya, sinopsis apa sahaja ceritakan ada lah ni semua ada. Jadi, ini ada prosedur, ini ada analisis, ha ini awak boleh rujuk, rujuk balik dalam bab metodologi penulisan tesis letak kat dalam ni. Kemudian barulah masuk tajuk keputusan dan perbincangan. Jadi dalam keputusan dan perbincangan ini, yang ini tadi teori pon kena ada ya dalam metodologi, keputusan dan perbicangan ini dia punya subtajuk kena lah kalau misalnya awak ikut teori, subtajuk mesti mengikut teorilah. Contohnya, ‘kandungan dalam interaksi perbualan’, contoh dia. Jadi maknanya, tajuk ini merupakan daripada teori. Ha lepas tu ada lah lagi ‘konteks dalam interaksi perbualan’, ‘andaian dalam interaksi perbualan’, ha begitu. Jadi ada lah disitu, huraian dia dalam ni samalah macam huraian dalam Bab 4, tak de masalah. Jadi yang ini terpulanglah, dia punya perenggan terpulang pada teori awak pilih. Kita ada banyak teori. Saya bagi yang teori analisis wacana ni teori yang saya ingat sekarang. Ada banyak lagi teori, teori kejuruteraan lain, teori sains lain, teori ekonomi lain, teori reka bentuk lain. Jadi berbeza. Lepas habis keputusan dan perbincangan, kita ada rumusan. Kalau kita tengok dekat sini ya, sebelum kesimpulan tu sebab kita ada nak rumuskan keputusan dan perbincangan, kita ada rumusan. Rumuskan, rumuskan dalam satu perenggan. Serupa juga dalam Bab 4 tesis kita, kita rumuskan, kita kena sokong. Sokong kajian yang atas tadi, dekat sorotan, yang ada dalam tesis lah. Maknanya yang ada dalam artikel. Jadi sokonglah itu, sokonglah teori. Cara penulisan dia sama dengan cara penulisan awak buat rumusan dalam Bab 4. Kemudian akhirnya, kesimpulan. Okay dalam kesimpulan ni, dalam ini saya dah jelaskan apa yang sepatutnya ada dalam kesimpulan. Okay dalam kesimpulan ni, menjelaskan manafaat yang diperoleh daripada keputusan kajian. Maknanya, awak jelaskan manafaat kepada siapa. Keputusan yang kita dapat ni manafaat kepada siapa. Awak jelaskan tiap-tiap satu dalam satu perenggan. Kemudian ayat akhir kesimpulan itu tadi, ini sama lah yang dengan awak manafaatnya tadi, memberi manafaat kepada siapa dalam kesimpulan. Dalam ini tidak perlu rujukan. Jangan ada rujukan pula dalam kesimpulan. Sebab kita dah ada rujukan dah sokong-sokong. Kesimpulan ni kita nk beri manfaat je jadi tk perlulah rujukan. Kemudian ayat akhir dalam kesimpulan kita letaklah ‘diharapkan kajian akan datang’, ingat tak ayat yang saya cakap tadi. Ayat tu ada dalam abstrak. Janganlah copy paste ubah la sikit ayat dia. Ada dalam abstrak iaitu ‘diharapkan kajian akan datang akan memberi fokus kepada lirik lagu cerita rakyat contoh dia. Jadi ada kaitanlah, ini macam cadangan kita, cadangan akan datang kita, inilah yang kita masuk dalam ayat akhir ni. Jadi dalam ini terpulang sebenarnya kepada jurnal atau bab dalam buku. Jumlah perkataan biasanya 5500. Ada yang orang kata jurnal yang sangat ketat dia punya peraturan, dia kata ‘okay satu artikel dia boleh terima 3000 je, jadi jangan lebih, kalau lebih biasanya dia suruh bayar. Terpulang kepada jurnal, ada jurnal dia kata ‘okay perlu 10000, ikut je lah patah perkataan dia. Ada jurnal dia punya subtopik ni berbeza. Subtopik berbeza, kita ikut ya. Terpulang kepada jurnal. Ini yang biasa. Ada jurnal yang kata ini, ini, ini, kita ubah la ikut jurnal itu. Jadi tulisan artikel ini untuk, artikel untuk jurnal, dan artikel untuk bab dalam buku pun sama sebenarnya. Penulisan ini memang biasanya kita kena ada. Kalau penulisan untuk pelajar sastera pun sama sebenarnya. Memang kena ada pengenalan, kena ada ni, ayat objektif, metodologi, keputusan dan perbincangan pun sama, cara penganalisis dia tengok lah awak nak pakai jadual, awak tak nak pakai jadual, awak nak sokong macam saya katakan awak nak sokong dekat rumusan ke, awak nak sokong dekat data ke masa huraian pon boleh takde masalah. Biasa ini adalah penulisan artikel, jurnal untuk semua bidang. Mungkin yang lain ialah terpulang kepada arahan yang di oleh jurnal tersebut. Jadi, yang penting juga, satu kena ada penanda wacana, ini kena ada lah, tiap-tiap halaman tesis kena ada, artikel pon ada. Nanti bila awak dh habis buat tesis, silap-silap hari bulan awak hafal semua beratus-ratus penanda wacana. Yang ada kat dalam buku ni sikit je, ha mungkin ada lagi banyak yang awak kena hafal. Penanda wacana mesti penting. Kemudian awak perlu semak banyak kali, semak dari segi ejaan, dari segi tatabahasa, semualah, semua kena semak. Pastu semak juga rujukan. Okay rujukan dalam artikel ada dalam artikel ada dalam rujukan, ada dalam rujukan ada dalam artikel. Ingat ya juga baca arahan tu berkali-kali. Dan juga yang penting yang macam saya kata tadi, kalau tajuk artikel tu tak menarik, orang pon tak nak baca. Kata kunci tu penting kerana di sini lah kalau kita taip kat google perkataan tu keluar kekadang artikel tu keseluruhan akan keluar. Jadi cari, kena pastikan semua kepentingan yang penting-penting ini semua ada dalam artikel awak. Kalau lihat disini, oh okay lupa saya, serupa juga dalam ini kena 70 peratus rujukan terkini. Jumlah semua semua artikel, semua rujukan, ini jumlah lima tahu kebelakang darab seratus sama dengan mesti 70 peratus. Dan juga kebanyakan artikel lah semua artikel pastikan tahun yang awak hantar artikel itu contohnya 2020, artikel yang 2020 ni mesti ada sekurang-kurangnya tiga. Mesti ada tahun terkini itu mesti ada tiga. Janganlah misalnya awak hantar artikel tu 2020, 2020 punya rujukan satu pon tak de, tak boleh, kena ada. Jadi jumlah tu kena kali dengan 70 peratus, dalam 70 peratus ni ada minima tiga artikel yang tahun itu, tahun yang hantar. Saya rasa kalau macam buat artikel ni tak susah, sebab kajian yang awak dah buat daripada tesis tu tadi sebenarnya awak boleh ambik, ubah ayat dia jadikan artikel, sebab kita ni sebagai penyelidik kita kutip data, kadang-kadang data tu berlebih-lebih, iya lah kita kena kutip data yang lebih janganlah kutip data ngam-ngam sebab nanti kang tak boleh nak kita pakai dalam tu. Jadi sebab itulah bila kadang-kadang tanya, pelajar tanya saya ‘Prof, saya punya data, saya dah ambik, saya temu bual pelajar ni, tapi kebetulan pulak kawan kepada pelajar tersebut dok berdiri je kat tepi tu, dia nak sangat ditemu bual, saya pon temu bual, jadi maknanya data saya lebih’, baguslah saya kata. Sebab nanti mungkin data yang ini tak cukup kita boleh pakai data yang itu. Ha jadi kita bersedia dengan data yang lebih. Biarlah lebih, kalau kurang kang jenuh la pula kena tunggu luar pagar lagi sekali. Heh tapi salah etika ya, tunggu luar pagar luar pagar tu semua salah etika. Perlu mohon kebenaran untuk mengutip data. Kebenaran kementerian kalau nak pergi sekolah, kementerian daripada sekolah, semua kena perlukan kebenaran. Awak nak kebenaran nak ambik data daripada anak buah kat rumah, anak kakak, anak abang kat rumah pun perlu kebenaran. Mahu abang dengan kakak tak bertegur lima tahun kalau ambik video anak dia, lepas tu masukkan data dalam tesis, mahu tak bertegur lima tahun kan tak dapat duit raya. Jadi pastikan dapat kebenaran. Biasanya ada kebenaran bertulis. Kalau kebenaran yang video pun ada, kan kena saman. Kalau kena saman kan sekurang-kurang awak ada ‘ini dia sebenarnya kebenaran saya dapati’ ataupun kalau misalnya dia kata ‘mana kebenaran awak, awak disaman ni 250,000 sebab tak berkebenaran awak temu bual pekerja saya’, daripada syarikat holding mana-mana. Jadi awak cakap ‘oh saya ada kebenaran daripada ini kebetulan dia punya pengurus besar dia kata boleh videokan, videokan gambar dia mengatakan kebenaran’, ha pakai je la yang itu pun boleh. Jadi pastikan ada kebenaran. Artikel ni semua ada kebenaran. Letakkan nama sampel contohnya, janganlah letak nama sebenar ya, jangan letak nama sebenar, letaklah nombor. Karang kan jenuhlah budak yang nama dia, nama pelajar itu contohnya Muhamad Yusof, ha ada lebih kurang 450 Muhamad Yusof datang tuntut saman ‘kenapa guna nama saya dalam ini?’. Okay.

TERJEMAHAN BAHASA INGGERIS.

12. Writing Articles for Publication in Journals. Let's Write a Thesis.

Okay let's write an article. Usually master students or PhD students are required to write articles for publication. So, I can teach you briefly how we want to write a good article that we can publish. So, for students who have never been published he will feel proud. Usually articles in journals or chapters in books, are usually almost the same. So, here we have a title, the title must be interesting, interesting title so people want to read our article. We include the abstract, our abstract is up to the journal which has how many words sometimes between 250 to 300. Then there is the introduction, there is a literature review. The literature review are up to the respective authors. Sometimes he did not put the word of literature review, he put a title like for example 'Animation of Folklore', he put it inside a literature review. Then there are methodologies, results and discussions, conclusions, and references. It is not a bibliography, it is a reference. So, in this one we first focus on the title, the title should be interesting, usually the title if the journal to the article to usually can not be more than 20 words. So, this abstract if we write in Malay language abstracts writing accompanied by an abstract in English to make it more clear. In this abstract we will place an example of a sentence of about five sentences, four or five sentences like the preamble verse here. For example, we put this preface as the background and also the problems faced, the problems of the study until the emergence we want to do this. This sentence is followed by an objective sentence, then there is a methodology. We have to put this methodology if there are samples and then go to the location, otherwise you don't have to place it like that. The location is then all up to theory. There must be a procedure, what kind of analysis, there should be an analysis, then from the description here we put we have the results, we put the results of our study in this abstract. We put the results and our final sentence will put what you expect in the next study. Hopefully future studies will focus on what, what, what. The last sentence must be there. Then accompanied by keywords. Okay keywords are usually five, keywords are five. And continued with the introduction. Usually this introduction you can put in more or less, we want to introduce this we have to put a background, we want to tell you about the name of the features and things that are related to our title just now. So, this introduction sometimes you put in one paragraph, this is quite important because there is a journal that have a rules he is very strict. This introduction, there are people placed in the form of literature review in there. So that's what to reject. So it depends on the existing journal, it depends. Read back what instructions were given. This one paragraph is like the background. Then enter the literature review. So, this in one paragraph. The literature review was like I said, you can put the word literature review or you can put the title of it like for example 'Animation of Folklore', can be between two, so highlight. This one you put in four paragraphs, okay put in four paragraphs that have highlighted the study five years ago only. Okay, five years ago, and also need to be critical. No, as I taught in Chapter 2, if you do not criticize him, he will stand on his own and cannot do that. Meaning, make it critical. This means that when the description in one paragraph has a name, then support it with other studies, parallel to, almost the same to, support to, put it there. Also put negative ones like ‘this study, Normaliza Abd Rahim’s study, 2019 was found to disagree with the study conducted by this, this, this, this”, put it to him who disagreed. It’s must, that's critis find the similarities and differences. Okay, these are four paragraphs, before the end of the literature review there are objective sentences. The objective sentence is not a subtopic. Usually just a sentence, in one sentence that is why this study is therefore from the spotlight, the problem of this study is all there is a research gap. In this all there is a research gap. So, therefore this study wants to identify and discuss what, what, what, what, one sentence only. So, this is a sentence, that is, after the highlight of the study. This means that this is another paragraph, this is a new paragraph. So, this is another paragraph. Okay another paragraph. So, that paragraph has one verse. Then continue to enter the title of the methodology. You have to complete all this methodology in the methodology you describe. You have to describe like the one in the thesis. There is a sample, there is a location, there is a procedure, there is an analysis, there is material, if for example there is material you have to put a synopsis of material, yes it is a synopsis of novels for example, synopsis of short stories for example, synopsis of whatever story there is. So, this is a procedure, this is an analysis, ha this you can refer to, refer back in the chapter on the methodology of writing a thesis put in here. Then enter the title of the decision and discussion. So, in this decision and discussion, this is the pound theory there must be in the methodology, decision and discussion he has the right subtitle, if for example you follow the theory, the subtitle must follow the theory. For example, ‘content in conversation interactions’, for example. So, that means this title is from theory. Then there is another ‘context in conversation interaction’, ‘assumption in conversation interaction’, like that. So, there it is, the description in this is the same as the description in Chapter 4, no problem. So, this one depends, has a paragraph depending on the theory you choose. We have many theories. I share this theory of discourse analysis theory that I remember now. There are many more theories, engineering theories are different, science theories are different, economic theories are different, design theories are different. So, it’s different. After the decision and discussion, we have a conclusion. If we look closely here, before that conclusion because we want to formulate decisions and discussions, we have formulations. Summarize, summarize in one paragraph. Similarly in Chapter 4 of our thesis, we formulate, we have to support. Support the above study, near the highlight, which is in the thesis. The meaning is in the article. So, support that, support theory. The way to writes is the same as the way you write the summary in Chapter 4. Then finally, the conclusion. Okay in this conclusion, in this I have explained what should be in the conclusion. Okay in this conclusion, explain the benefits derived from the results of the study. Meaning, you explain the benefits to whom. The results we get are beneficial to whom. You explain each one in a paragraph. Then the last sentence of the conclusion just now, this is the same with you the benefits just now, give benefits to whom in the conclusion. In this there is no need for reference. Do not have any references in the conclusion. Because we already have references and support. This conclusion we will give benefits so there is no need for reference. Then the last sentence in our conclusion is 'hopefully the next study', remember the sentence I said earlier. That verse is in the abstract. Do not copy and paste a few verses. There is in the abstract that ‘hopefully the next study will focus on the lyrics of folklore songs example him. So there is a connection, this is like our suggestion, our next suggestion, this is what we enter in this last sentence. So in this it really depends on the journal or chapter in the book. The number of words is usually 5500. Some people say a very strict journal has rules, he says ‘okay one article he can accept 3000 only, so don’t overdo it, if more he usually tells you to pay. Depending on the journal, there is a journal he said ‘okay need 10000, just follow the number of words. There are journals has different subtopics. Subtopics are different, we must follow. Depends on the journal. This is normal. There is a journal that says this, this, this, we change it to follow that journal. So, the writing of this article for, articles for journals, and articles for chapters in books are actually the same. This writing is usually what we have to have. If writing for literary students is actually the same. There must be an introduction, there must be this, the objective sentence, methodology, results and discussion are the same, the way the analyst sees it is you want to use the schedule, you do not want to use the schedule, you want to support like I said you want to support near the formula, you want to support close data to the time of pound description can be no problem. This is usually the writing of articles, journals for all fields. Perhaps the rest is up to the instructions given by the journal. So, the important thing is, one has to have a discourse marker, this has to be there, every thesis page has to exist, the article has pounds. Later when you finish your thesis, you mistakenly memorize all the hundreds of discourse markers on the day of the month. The ones in this book are a little je, ha maybe there is a lot more you have to memorize. Discourse markers must be important. Then you have to check many times, check in terms of spelling, in terms of grammar, everything, everything has to be checked. Also check the reference. Okay the reference in the article is, in the article there is in the reference, there is in the reference there is in the article. Remember to read the instructions many times. And also the important thing like I said earlier, if the title of the article is not interesting, people do not want to read. The keyword is important because this is where if we type in google the word comes out sometimes the whole article will come out. So look, you have to make sure all these important interests are all in your article. If you look here, oh okay forget me, similar in this need 70 percent latest reference. The sum of all all the articles, all the references, this is the sum of five know behind one hundred times equal to must 70 percent. And also most of the articles are all articles make sure the year you submit the article for example 2020, this 2020 article must have at least three. There must be a recent year that there must be three. Do not, for example, you submit the article 2020, 2020 has a one-pound reference, it is not allowed, it must be three. So, that number has to be multiplied by 70 percent, in this 70 percent there are a minimum of three articles that year, the year you submit. I think how to make this article is not difficult, because the study you did from the thesis earlier you can actually take, change the sentence he made into an article, because we as researchers we collect data, sometimes the data is too much, we have to collect more data do not collect data just enough because later you can not want us to use in there. So, that's why when sometimes ask, students ask me 'Prof, I have data, I have ambiguous, I interviewed this student, but it just so happened that a friend of the student was standing by the side, he really wanted to be interviewed, I pound interview, so that means my data is more ', well it’s good I said. Because later maybe this data is not enough we can use that data. Ha so we are ready with more data. Let it be more, if it is less saturated it will have to wait outside the fence again. Take not, that was a wrong ethics, wait outside the fence is all wrong ethics. Need permission to request data collection. Ministry permission if you want to go to school, ministry from school, everyone needs permission. You want permission to take data from the children at home, the children of the sisters, the children of the brothers at home also need permission. Want a brother and sister who have not been reprimanded for five years if you take a video of their child, then enter the data in the thesis, if you do not want to be reprimanded for five years, you will not get Hari Raya money. So, make sure you get the truth. There is usually written permission. If the truth of the video is there, you will be sued. If you are sued, at least you have ‘this is actually the truth I found’ or if for example he said ‘where is your permission, you are summoned 250,000 because you are not allowed to interview my employees’, from any holding company. So, you said ‘oh I have permission from this coincidentally he has a general manager he said can videotape, videotape he says the truth’, so it can be used it. So, make sure there is truth. This article is all true. Put a sample name for example, do not put the real name, do not put the real name, put the number. If not, boy whose name, the name of the student for example Muhamad Yusof, so there are about 450 Muhamad Yusof came to demand a suit ‘why use my name in this?’. Okay.

Rujukan: 

Prof. Dr Normaliza Abd Rahim. (2020). 12. Menulis Artikel untuk Terbitan Dalam Jurnal. Jom Tulis Tesis. Diakses pada  Januari 8, 2021 melalui pautan https://youtu.be/1Wvq6FToC9I

Saya sudah subscribe! Anda bila lagi☺☺☺

KERJA KUMPULAN:

Gambar Bukti Kehadiran Minggu 11

BBN3402SATU2020: MINGGU11 TERJEMAHAN VIDEO(4)

11. Menulis Bibliografi. #JomTulisTesis

Bibliografi. Bibliografi ini pentinglah, memanglah semua penting, semua bab dalam tesis penting, semua penulisan penting, bibliografi pun penting. Jadi, bila kita nak buat  bibiliografi, kita kena konsisten lah. Kita sama ada buat gaya APA atau MLA. Tetapi, biasanya pelajar dia suka yang APA ini, katanya mudah tapi bila kita tengok buat salah juga. Jadi bibiliografi ini kalau APA itu biasa lah kalau kita tengok dalam buku ini saya ada letak contoh bagaimana nak tulis rujukan dalam bentuk APA. Sebab kalau saya letak dua-dua, biasanya lah dalam kebanyakan tesis memang APA. Jadi kita kena pastikan bahawa kalau jurnal kalau rujukan jurnal dia punya nama jurnal italic. Jadi kalau kita lihat di sini kalau kita lihat contoh-contoh yang terdapat dalam errr dalam ini. Kejap ya. Okey. Kita adalah semua sekali. macam mana kita nak, bibiliografi dan rujukan contoh nama Melayu kita nak rujuk macam mana, nama. Contohnya kalau contoh bibliografi rujukan nama Alim Al Mustaqimbillah Roslan. Nama dia kemainlah panjangnya. Contohnya, nama Melayu kena letak nama melayu semua panjang-panjang lebar tu . Ialah maklumlah zaman sekarang kan nama Melayu ada tiga perkataan, ada sampai empat perkataan, ada yang sampai lima, penat cikgu nak tulis kat dalam masa sekolah nanti ya. Sebab itulah nama, contohnya nama Alim Al-Mustaqimbillah akhirnya mak dia, dia pergi , apa nama buat cop, jadi buku tulis semua dia cop sahaja . Tak larat nak tulis dengan tangan. Jadi, nama melayu letak nama penuh. Dalam bibiliografi pun penuh dalam rujukan pun penuh. Dalam tesis ni, dalam bibiliografi begini. Jadi, semuanya nama begini. Kalau nak nama Chin Lin Li, contohnya letak Chin ataupun bukan bibliografi letak Chin L L dalam bibliografi. Nama Arumugam Muthusamy bagaimana bagaimana, nama Jepun bagaimana bagaimana dan seterusnya. Ada contoh-contoh. Jadi, kalau misalnya kalau kita lihat di sini kita lihat dalam buku ini kalau rujukan dalam tesis kita letak kalau ni Normaliza Abd Rahim 2019 dalam kurungan. Kemudian, ada jadi kalau kurungan semua letak kurungan semua ada takde koma. Jadi ini titik dua kalau ada halaman dan seterusnya. Kita ada banyak contoh-contoh kita ya. Jadi bibiliografi hendaklah mengandungi maklumat seperti berikut. Jadi ini ada semua maklumat-maklumat dia. Jadi, penulisan rujukan dalam tesis bagaimana. Ini semua arahan ya. Jadi ada cara-cara penulisan semua ada dalam ini supaya ia tidak keliru. Apa yang saya nak jelaskan di sini pastikan apa penulisan dia mesti betul dalam bibiliografi dan juga yang penting ini dalam tesis, ini bibliografi. Okey Apa yang awak rujuk dalam tesis perlu ada dalam bibliografi. Kemudian semak. Saya suka semak secara manual yang manual maknanya saya printkan bibiliografi letak tepi. Laptop letak kat sini. Tengok muka surat satu-satu letak. Kalau yang dah kita letak warna merah dekat laptop lepastu bibiliografi kita tanda right. Sebab kalau buat manual memang betul. Kita bukan nak percaya sangat dekat mesin ni. Bukan tak percaya ya, memang tak percaya. Mesin nama pun mesin kan. Jadi dalam tesis ada rujukan tu dalam bibilio ada rujukan tu. Ni sebelum kita nak hantar tesis ni. Kemudian kita semak dalam bibiliografi ada nama tu kenalah dalam tesis pun ada bermakna kita kena cross represif. Bermakna kedua-duanya pasti ada, ada yang tak ada buang, janganlah semata-mata bercita-cita nak bibiliografi sampai 10, 15 halaman sedangkan tak ada pun dalam tesis, memang kita pemeriksa kita semak satu-satu.  Sebab itu tugas pemeriksa satu-satu. Itulah kerja saya, saya baca dalam tesis, saya buka saya tengok belakang, saya baca saya right.  Eh ni kenapa belakang dalam ni tahun contohnya dalam dalam ini namanya Muhammad Mustaqim Roslan 2019 tiba-tiba dekat belakang Muhammad Mustaqim Roslan 2018 pula dah lain pulak. Itu macam seolah ada dua artikel berbeza jadi salah macam contohnya dalam bibiliografi ada. Aiman Mustaqim Roslan 2019 tengok dekat dalam Aiman Mustaqim Roslan 2015 memang tak kena lah dua-dua salah. Jadi, pastikan semak satu-satu. Okey untuk tesis ya, memanglah untuk tesis dan juga untuk artikel pun macam tu ya kita perlu ada 70% rujukan terkini. Terkini maknanya macam saya kata ya mestilah rujukan yang 5 tahun kebelakang. Jadi yang itulah yang awak-awak pastikan kalau awak hantar tesis pada 2023 maknanya lima tahun kebelakangan 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019 , 5 tahun ke belakang. Okey 70% mana apa yang awak buat ialah jumlah kesemua dulu semua dalam bibiliografi, okey dalam bibiliografi. Kemudian, mula jumlah contohnya jumlah nanti kita bagi contoh ya. Jumlah ada 100 semua sekali dalam tesis dia kemudian saya kira yang 5 tahun ke belakang. Okey, lima  tahun ke belakang saya kira ada 70 , 70 ya . Jadi awak tekan awak punya kalkulator dekat telefon awak yang mahal daripada saya tu, jadi, awak tekan kalkulator jadi tekanlah apa X 100,  maknanya awak sudah ada 70% rujukan terkini . Maknanya tesis ini boleh diterima . Boleh diterima kalau misalnya ialah maklumlah kita ni nak sebenarnya nak mengelak daripada pelajar ni plagiat dia tiru bulat-bulat lah ataupun pelajar tu memang memang malas lah kesimpulannya. Nak baca pun tak nak, nak rujuk yang terkini lagilah tak nak lepas tu bila kita tanya kenapa tak ada rujukan terkini. “Oh, tak ada kajian Prof tak ada, saya cari-cari tak jumpa”. Yang dia cari tu ada tiga je artikel yang dia cari yang lagi 546 artikel tajuk sama dia tak cari. Jadi, dia kata “saya dah cari tapi tak jumpa”. Aduhai, jadi ayat tu kita tak mahu terima. jadi semua pun tak terima bukan saya tak terima saya rasa semua penyelia pun tak terima. Jadi pastikan awak cari tepat dapat 70% memang boleh terima boleh duduk goyang kaki pergi jalan-jalan, pergi IOI makan banyak-banyak sebab bolehlah kita meraikan bahawa rujukan 70% sudah tercapai haa begitu. Jadi, pastikan 70%. Janganlah sampai awak dapat, “Alamak Prof 20% je Prof? saya dah usaha tiga tahun saya usaha nak cari rujukan yang terkini tak jumpa saya dapat semua kebanyakan 1980-an”. Pastu dapatlah 2010 ke bawah memang saya kata sila lah buat Universiti sendiri sebab dia tak usaha langsung jadi pastikan 70% daripada rujukan terkini . Tengoklah bila tarikh yang awak nak hantar, buatlah rujukan itu. Jangan ada satu lagi ya. Contohnya kalau awak nak hantar tadi 2023. Okey, dia nak hantar 2023 tu pada bulan Disember, Okeylah kita ambil Oktober ya Oktober dia hantar 2023. Tetapi didapati bahawa yang rujukan 2023 tiada. Langsung tiada dalam tesis tersebut sedangkan masa yang dia nak submit ialah Oktober. Maknanya artikel untuk 2023 dah keluar banyak dah. Dah keluar banyak tapi bila kita semak tak ada rujukan 2023. Ha 2022 lagi dah tak ada yang dia banyak yang ini 2021 2022. Tak bolehlah. Kita kenalah ada terutama yang ini yang memang kalau yang ada terkini masa awak hantar tesis Memang terbaik lah. Ada pula ini lagi ya jadi ini penting jangan yang ini dia kita fokus jadi pastikan ada pada tarikh awak hantar tu tahun itu punya rujukan mesti ada. Okey penting.  Bahagian ini penting rujukan ni semua penting. Cara-cara nak rujuk semua ada dekat dalam ni. Ada pelbagai cara buat rujukan bibiliografi dan rujukan bagaimana kita nak tulis semua cara dia berbeza. Ya. Tapi kalau nama Melayu dalam Jurnal melayu memang tulis nama penuhnya Normaliza Abd Rahim Contoh dia. Tetapi kekadang saya hantar artikel ke jurnal antarabangsa , contohnya saya dah tulis dalam artikel tu Normaliza Abd rahim bibiliografi Normaliza Abd Rahim tetapi dia orang yang format kan semula jadi nama saya jadi, jadi begini. Dia automatik kan buat saya tak buat sebab saya percaya sebab kalau yang ini ada berjuta-juta orang nama Rahim N.A. Terutamanya Rahim ini memang ramai lah berjuta. Jadi sebab itu saya amik Normaliza Abd Rahim tapi terpaksa lah kita ikut cara jurnal itu. Sebab jurnal antarabangsa memang dia ada format dia sendiri kena kadang-kadang kita submit saya submit dihantar balik katakan mohon untuk tukar, tukar cara penulisan sebaik kena ikut cara dia Ini kerana kalau barat memang nama akhir lah. Sebab itu dia kena ikut semua cara barat jadi ikut ikut lah cara barat. Terpulang kepada apa yang terkeluar. Ini kalau jurnal. Nanti jurnal saya jelaskan dalam video yang lain. Jadi jelas ya tentang penulisan bibiliografi ini sangat penting 70% kalau tak cukup cari lagi.  Jangan hantar tesis selagi tak cukup sebab ini menunjukkan kualiti tesis tersebut.  misalnya awak dapat 60% tu memang tak boleh nak di terima sebab macam tak nak usaha sebenar boleh je cari banyak je artikel yang awak boleh sorot untuk dah artikel terkini yang awak boleh sorot ya.

TERJEMAHAN BAHASA INGGERIS

11. Write a Bibliography. #Let'sWriteAThesis

Bibliography. This bibliography is important, of course all is important, all the chapters in the thesis are important, all the writing is important, the bibliography is also important. So, when we want to do bibliography, we have to be consistent. We either do APA style or MLA. But, usually his students like this APA, he said it is easy but when we look at it make a mistake too. So this bibliography if APA is normal if we look in this book I have an example of how to write a reference in the form of APA. Because if I put two, usually in most theses is APA. So we have to make sure that if the journal if the journal reference he has the name of the italic journal. So if we look here if we look at the examples found in errr in this. Just a second. Okay. We are all at once. how can we, bibliography and reference examples Malay name we want to refer to any kind of name. For example, if the bibliography is a reference to the name of Alim Al Mustaqimbillah Roslan. His name is a long play. For example, the name of the Malay name Malay touched all long-length. Today it's known is a Malay name three words, there are up to four words, there are up to five, i'm going to write a bit tired in the later school years. That is why the name, for example the name of Alim Al-Mustaqimbillah finally his mother, he left, what is the name for the stamp, so all the notebooks he stamped only. No need to write by hand. Thus, the name of Malay park full name. The bibliography is full and the references are full. In this thesis, in this bibliography. So, everything is named like this. If you want the name Chin Lin Li, for example put Chin or not bibliography put Chin L L in the bibliography. Name Arumugam Muthusamy how how, Japanese name how how and so on. There are examples. So, if for example if we look here we see in this book if the reference in the thesis we put if this Normaliza Abd Rahim 2019 in parentheses. Then, there is so that if all the brackets are in the brackets, there will be no coma. So this is point two if there is a page and so on. We have many examples of us yes. So the bibliography should contain the following information. So here is all his information. So, writing a reference in the thesis how. These are all instructions. So there are ways of writing all there in this so that it is not confused. What I want to explain here is make sure that what he writes must be correct in the bibliography and also that this is important in the thesis, this is the bibliography. Okay What you refer to in the thesis should be in the bibliography. Then check. I like to check manually which manual means I print the sidebar bibliography. The laptop is located here. Look at the pages one by one. If we have put a red color near the laptop then our bibliography is the right sign. Because if you make a manual, it is correct. We do not want to believe very close to this machine. Not that I don't believe it, I do not believe it. The name machine is also a machine, right? So in the thesis there is that reference in the bibilio there is that reference. This is before we want to submit this thesis. Then we check in the bibliography there is a name that must be in the thesis also means we have to be cross repressive. This means that both must be there, some are not discarded, do not just aspire to bibliography up to 10, 15 pages while not even in the thesis, we do check our examiners one by one. That is why it is the duty of the examiner one by one. That is my work, I read in the thesis, I open I look back, I read I right. Eh, why is the back in this year, for example in this, his name is Muhammad Mustaqim Roslan 2019, suddenly near the back of Muhammad Mustaqim Roslan 2018, it is different. It's as if there are two different articles so one of the examples in the bibliography is there. Aiman ​​Mustaqim Roslan 2019 look closely in Aiman ​​Mustaqim Roslan 2015 is not wrong, both are wrong. So, be sure to check one by one. Okay for the thesis yes, of course for the thesis and also for the article like that yes we need to have 70% latest reference. The latest meaning is like I said yes it must be a reference 5 years ago. So that is what you make sure if you submit your thesis in 2023 it means five years from 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 5 years back. Okay 70% of what you do is the sum of all first all in bibliography, okay in bibliography. Then, start the number for example the amount later we will give an example yes. There are a total of 100 all at once in his thesis then I count that 5 years back. Okay, five years ago I thought there were 70, 70 yes. So you press you have a calculator near your phone that is more expensive than me, so, you press the calculator so press what X 100, it means you already have 70% of the latest references. This means that this thesis is acceptable. It can be accepted if, for example, you know we want to actually want to avoid this student plagiarism he imitated completely or the student is really lazy in conclusion. I want to read but I don't want to, I want to refer to the latest and I don't want to miss it when we ask why there is no latest reference. "Oh, there is no Prof study, there is no search, I was looking but could not find it". What he was looking for was three articles he was looking for and another 546 articles of the same title he was not looking for. So, he said "I searched but did not find". What, so that sentence we do not want to accept. so everyone does not accept, not I do not accept, I think all supervisors do not accept. So make sure you find exactly can 70% can accept can sit rocking legs go the streets, go IOI eat a lot of reasons we can celebrate that the reference 70% has been achieved haa so. So, make sure 70%. Do not until you get, "Oh Prof 20% only Prof? I have been trying for three years, I tried to find the latest reference, but I did not find it, I got it all in the 1980s ”. Then I got 2010 and below, I said please make your own University because it is not a direct effort so make sure 70% of the latest references. See when the date you want to send, make that reference. Don't have another one. For example, if you want to send 2023. Okay, he wants to send 2023 in December, Okay, we take October, yes October he sent 2023. But it was found that the 2023 reference does not exist. Absolutely not in the thesis while the time he wants to submit is October. This means that articles for 2023 have come out a lot. It has come out a lot but when we check there is no reference 2023. Ha 2022 again there is not much he has this 2021 2022. It is not allowed. We have to have this, especially this one, which if it is the latest when you submit your thesis, it is the best. There is this again, yes, so this is important, don't focus on this one, so make sure it is on the date you sent it, that year there must be a reference. Okay important. This section is important this reference is all important. Ways to refer all are close in here. There are various ways to make a bibliographic reference and reference how we want to write all the ways he is different. Yes. But if the name of the Malays in the Malay Journal wrote his full name was Abd Rahim Normaliza Example him. But sometimes I send articles to international journals, for example I have written in the article Normaliza Abd rahim bibliography Normaliza Abd Rahim but he is a person who naturally formats my name so, so this. He automatically for me did not do it because I believe because if this one has millions of people named Rahim N.A. Especially this Rahim is indeed millions. So that's why I am friends with Normaliza Abd Rahim but we have to follow the way of the journal. Because international journals do have their own format, sometimes we have to submit, I submit, send back, say please change, change the way you write, you have to follow his way. That is why he has to follow all the western ways so follow the western way. Depends on what comes out. This is a journal. Later my journal will explain in another video. So it is clear that the writing of this bibliography is very important 70% if you do not look enough anymore. Do not submit a thesis as long as it is not enough because this shows the quality of the thesis. For example, you get 60%, you really can't be accepted because you don't seem to want real effort, you can look for many articles that you can highlight for the latest articles that you can highlight.

 

Rujukan:

Prof. Dr Normaliza Abd Rahim. (2020). 11. Menulis Bibliografi. #JomTulisTesis. Diakses pada Januari 8, 2021 melalui pautan https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfEH5vpCwBs

‌

Saya sudah subscribe! Anda bila lagi☺☺☺

KERJA KUMPULAN:

Gambar Bukti Kehadiran Minggu 11

BBN3402SATU2020: MINGGU11 TERJEMAHAN VIDEO(3)

6. Definisi Operasional & Organisasi Kajian (Bab 1). #JomTulisTesis

1.8 DEFINISI OPERASIONAL

1.8.1 MAKNA TEKSTUAL

Ini agak sukar kerana kadang-kadang pelajar ini keliru. Operasional bermakna tentang definisi kajian yang kita lakukan bukan definisi konsep. Bukan buat apa makna wacana? Apa makna skrip? Apa makna tekstual? Apa makna animasi?cerita satu? Rakyat satu? Itu salah yer. Kita bukan nak kaji definisi itu. Kalau definisi tiap-tiap satu pelajar akan rujuk kamus dewan dia rujuk semua jenis kamus. Tak boleh. Jangan. Jadi operasional tentang kajian kita. Jadi definisi operasional ini minima dua atau paling maksima pun tiga supaya apabila pembaca faham maksud kajian itu. Kalau kita tengok tajuk ini, kita boleh ambil wacana tekstual. Lagi satu skrip animasi cerita rakyat Melayu. Kalau kita nak bezakan skrip animasi tiada kaitan. Untuk tajuk ini mungkin ada dua. Tajuk lain mungkin ada tiga. Klau kita amik tajuk kejuruteraan misalnya mungkin definisi operasionalitu ada banyak dia punya pemboleh ubah dalam tu. Kalau daripada tesis sains pun begitu. Ada banyak pemboleh ubah yang membolehkan kita membuat definisi operasional. Jadi pemeriksa faham apa yang diterangkan itu dalam tesis tersebut. Kalau kita tengok tesis bidang ekonomi pun begitu. Kita ada banyak dia punya pemboleh ubah. Jadi mungkin lebih daripada tiga. Jadi untuk ini kita focus kepada dua. Ini saya bagi contoh. Jadi awak boleh buat macam ini. Contohnya wacana tekstual tapi waana ini mesti berkaitan dengan kajian. Bermakna awak kena amik dari rujukan. Caranya awak buat wacana tekstual berkaitan skrip animasi. Contohnya wacana ini akan dianalisis dengan menggunakan tiga elemen. Kandungan, konteks dan andaian. Jadi menurut Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019) wacana tekstual apa dia,apa dia dan apa dia. 

1.8.2 SKRIP ANIMASI CERITA RAKYAT MELAYU

Jadi ini kenalah berkaitan dengan kajian awak. Apa dia?. Huraikan ringkas. Skrip animasi ini terdiri daripada 20 cerita sebab dalam awak punya analisis ada 20 cerita. Jadi skrip animasi ini berbentuk apa dia,apa dia. Jadi skrip animasi ini awak kena huraikan berkaitan dengan kajian kita. Kalau tiada rujukan boleh diterima. Definisi yang ini memang berkaitan dengan kajian awak. Jadi dadua cara. Satu cara mempunyai rujukan dan satu lagi tiada rujukan. Maknanya awak buat huraian tentang wacana tekstual itu dari segi konteks awak punya tesis yang ini pun daripada konteks awak punya tesis. Dua-dua boleh diterima. Tetapi macam yang saya katakana sebelum ini, rujuk penyelia. Kalau rujuk penyelia kata ada rujukan letak rujukan. Kalau penyelia kata takper saya percaya bahawa kalau tiada rujukan pun saya faham dan sebenarnya tidak perlukan kerana ia berkaitan dengan kajian awak. Bukan kajian orang lain. Pun diterima. Macam saya kata sebelum ini, penyelia ini berbeza pendapat. Kalau ada sejuta penyelia, kita ada sejuta pemikiran yang berbeza. Jadi terpulang kepada penyelia. Kalau macam saya tidak perlu rujukan kerana definisi operasional ni tentang kajian bagaimana awak nak jalankan kajian. Nama pun operasi.kalau awak nak buat rujukan tak boleh yer. Tak boleh rujuk kamus. Kena rujuk daripada kajian . jangan kata menurut kamus dewan keempat, wacana tekstual ialah blab la bla. Janganlah rujuk maus. Dah kenapa. Jadi kita rujuk rujukan. Rujukan ini diambil dari kajian orang lain. 

1.9 ORGANISASI KAIIAN

Organisasi kajian ini sebenarnya terpulang kepada individu, pelajar dan juga penyelia. Yang ini biasanya saya akan suruh untuk pelajar PhD. Saya akan suruh letak organisasi kajian. Kadang-kadang pelajar Master pon boleh. Dia tak letak pun takper. Ini boleh pilih jika perlu. Organisasi kajian ini awak buat dalam bentuk perenggan. Perenggan pertama apa ada dalam bab 1. Kemudian perenggan seterusnya apa ada dalam bab 2 dan perenggan tiga apa ada dalam bab 3. Kita nak secara ringkas supaya bila penyelia baca dia tahu bab 1 ada ini. Bab 2 ada ini rupanya. Bab 3 ada ini rupanya. Penyusunan tesiskita secara teratur. Terangkan secara ringkas sahaja. Macam saya kata sebelum ini tiap-tiap bab ada pengenalankan. Pelajar PhD memang saya wajibkan supaya dia sendiri boleh faham apa ada dalam tiap-tiap bab. Kalau pelajar master terpulang kat mereka. Pelajar bachelor dan diploma pun ada pilihan nak buat atau tak. Pokoknya terpulang kepada penyelia. 

1.10 KESIMPULAN

Tadi semua bab mesti ada kesimpualn. Tiada kesimpulan tak boleh sebab kita kena simpulkan apa yang ada dalam bab tersebut. Jadi ada yang saya dapati tesis tiada kesimpulan. Tergantung huraian tiba-tiba masuk bab 2. Jadi tiada kesinambungan bab 1 dengan bab 2. Macam bab 1. Dia jadi macam entity lain pulak. Takder kaitan langsung dengan bab 2. Jadi ingat ayat akhir kita kena letak kaitkan dengan bab seterusnya iaiatu bab 2 akan membincangkan sorotan kajian blab la bla. Dengan cara itu bolehlah kita dapati ada kesinambungan antara bab 1 dan bab 2. Sama juga macam yang saya terangkan dalam bab-bab yang lain. Dalam ayat akhir kita perlu nyatakan apa yang ada dalam bab seterusnya. Jadi penting ada kesimpulan. Tapi tengok kepada keinginan penyelia. Pemikirian berbeza macam saya kata tdi difeffrent school of thought. Jadi bila berbeza kita kena redha dan kita terima. Ok ni bab 1 kita dah bersemangat. Halaman untuk bab 1 ialah 8 hingga 10 halaman sahaja. Inikan bahaya sebab ada pelajar dia letak sampai 30 halaman. Nak tahu kenapa jadi 30? Bahagian masalah kajian itu pun dah 15 halaman. Bila masalah kajian itu 15 halaman seolah dia buat sorotan kajian. Itu dah salah sebab masalah kajian ini kita ambik yang betul-betul penting. sedangkan kita tahu bahawa dalam bab 2 ada banyak jurang. Jadi itu pun semua adalah masalah tapi kita amik ambik yang penting sahaja. Jadi bila dia letak masalah kajian itu 30, bermakna memang salah lah. Dia jadikan kajian itu panjang lebar. Semangat sangat dia tulis masalah kajian dia jadi banyak halaman.yang lain tu memang lah sikit-sikit macam sorotan kajian. Dah salah. Macam saya kata tadi, masalah kajian itu kita fokuskan ikut objektif. Objektif ada dua, dua perenggalah masalah kajian. Objektif ada tiga, tiga perenggan. Padat kat dalam tu walaupun ringkas. Jadi yang selebihnya jurang pendidikan yang lain ada dalam bab 2. Jadi boleh rujuk daripada situ. Jadi kita buang kita letak macam ini. Paling banyka lebih kurang 12 macam itu. Tpi janganlah kurang daripada lapan. Jadi macam kurang halamanlah pulak. Jadi lebih sikit-sikit boleh. Kalau nak sampai 15 pon boleh mungkin sebab dia bersemangat nak tulis latar belakang. Tiada masalah tapi jangan lebih. Lebih daripada 15 mmang tak bolelah sebab kita takut ia jadi keseluruhan bab 2. Jadi bab 2 tu nanti pemeriksa akan pangkah ini tak boleh, dia potong-potong. Kalau saya nampak tesis tu panjang sangat saya tulis kat sini ini sepatutnya masuk bab 2. Sebab masa viva senang saya ingat. Yang saya lipat adalah setebal-tebalnya. Yang tak berkaitan dengan masalah kajian pun berleter je lebih. Menurut pendapat dialah. Dia kata saya dapati bahawa pelajar memang tak suka belajar. Masa tu baca kertas awak tu, siapa yang awak kata. Dia bagi pendapat ikut suka dia je. Itu yang menjadi masalah dalam kajian nanti.

TERJEMAHAN INGGERIS

6. Operational Definition & Organization of the Study (Chapter 1). #Let’sWriteAThesis

1.8 OPERATIONAL DEFINITION

1.8.1 TEXTUAL MEANING

This is quite difficult because sometimes these students are confused. Operational means about the definition of the study we are doing not the definition of the concept. What is the meaning of the discourse? What does the script mean? What is the textual meaning? What is the meaning of animation? Story one? People one? That's wrong yer. We do not want to study that definition. If the definition of each student will refer to the hall dictionary he refers to all types of dictionaries. Can not. Don't. Be operational about our study. So this operational definition is at least two or at most three so that when the reader understands the meaning of the study. If we look at this topic, we can take a textual discourse. Another animation script Malay folklore. If we want to differentiate the animated script has nothing to do. For this title there may be two. Other titles may have three. If we like the title of engineering, for example, maybe the operational definition has a lot of variables in it. If it is from a science thesis, it is the same. There are many variables that allow us to make operational definitions. So the examiner understands what is described in the thesis. If we look at the thesis in economics, so is it. We have a lot he has variables. So maybe more than three. So for this we focus on two. Here I am for an example. So you can do this. For example textual discourse but this waana must be relevant to the study. That means you have to be friendly from the reference. How do you create a textual discourse related to animated scripts. For example this discourse will be analyzed using three elements. Content, context and assumptions. So according to Normaliza Abd Rahim (2019) textual discourse is what she is, what she is and what she is.

1.8.2 ANIMATION SCRIPT FOLKTALE ENGLISH

Therefore, analysis should be done with careful study. What is it ?. Briefly describe. This animated script consists of 20 stories because in the wake of the analysis there are 20 stories. So this animated script shapes what he is, what he is. So this animated script woke up to be elaborated with our study. If no reference is acceptable. This definition is indeed related to careful study. So both ways. One way is different reference and another no reference. This means that you make a description of the textual discourse from the point of view. Both are acceptable. But as I said before, consult the supervisor. If you consult the supervisor, there is a reference place. If the supervisor says takper I believe that even if there is no reference I understand and in fact it is not necessary because it is related to careful study. Not someone else's study. Also accepted. Like I said before, these supervisors have different opinions. If there are a million supervisors, we have a million different thoughts. So it is up to the supervisor. If so, I do not need a reference because the operational definition is about the study of waking up and conducting research. Even the name of the operation. If you want to make a reference, you can not. Cannot refer to dictionary. Must refer to the study. do not say according to the fourth board dictionary, textual discourse uses blab la bla. Do not consult maus. Why not? So we refer to the reference. This reference is taken from the study of others.

1.9 ORGANIZATION

The organization of this study is actually up to individuals, students and even supervisors. This one I usually recommend for PhD students. I will order the study organization. Sometimes Master pound students can. He is not even located. This can be selected if necessary. The organization of this study you made in the form of paragraphs. The first paragraph is in chapter 1. Then the next paragraph is in chapter 2 and the third paragraph is in chapter 3. We want to briefly so that when the supervisor reads he knows chapter 1 is here. Chapter 2 is here apparently. Chapter 3 is here apparently. Organizing our thesis regularly. Explain briefly only. Like I said before, every chapter has an implementation. A PhD student is indeed obligatory for me so that he himself can understand what is in each chapter. If the master student is up to them. Bachelor and diploma students also have a choice to make or not. The point is up to the supervisor.

1.10 CONCLUSION

Earlier all chapters must have conclusions. There is no conclusion because we have to conclude what is in the chapter. So there I find the thesis no conclusion. Depending on the description suddenly enters chapter 2. So there is no continuity of chapter 1 with chapter 2. Like chapter 1. He becomes like any other entity. Destiny is directly related to chapter 2. So remember the last sentence we have to put in relation to the next chapter which is chapter 2 will discuss the highlights of the study blab la bla. That way we can find the continuity between chapter 1 and chapter 2. Just like I explained in the other chapters. In the last sentence we need to state what is in the next chapter. So it is important to have a conclusion. But look at the wishes of the supervisor. Thoughts are different as I said tdi difeffrent school of thought. So when it is different we have to be content and we accept. Ok this is chapter 1 we are excited. The pages for chapter 1 are only 8 to 10 pages long. This is dangerous because there are students he puts up to 30 pages. Want to know why to be 30? The problem section of the study is already 15 pages. When the problem of the study was 15 pages it was as if he was making a study highlight. That is wrong because the problem of this study we take is really important. whereas we know that in chapter 2 there are many gaps. So even that is all a problem but we amik ambic only important. So when he puts the study problem 30, it means it is wrong. He made the study lengthy. He was very enthusiastic about writing his research problems so there were many pages. The others were indeed a little like the highlights of the study. Wrong. Like I said earlier, we focus on the problem of the study according to the objectives. The objective is to have two, two problem-solving studies. Objectives are three, three paragraphs. Dense inside even though simple. So the rest of the other education gaps are in chapter 2. So you can refer from there. So we throw our place like this. At most 12 there are about 12 of them. Tpi should not be less than eight. So it looks like there are less pages. So a little more can. If you want to reach 15 pounds, it may be because he is eager to write the background. No problem but no more. More than 15 mmang is not possible because we are afraid it will be the whole of chapter 2. So chapter 2 later the examiner will cross this can not, he cut. If I see that the thesis is very long, I will write it here, it should go into chapter 2. Because the viva time is easy for me to remember. What I fold is as thick as it gets. What is not related to the problem of the study is even more complicated. In his opinion he is. He said I found that students do not like to study. That time read your paper, who did you say. He shared his opinion. That is the problem in the study later.

Rujukan:

Prof. Dr Normaliza Abd Rahim. (2020). 6. Definisi Operasional & Organisasi Kajian (Bab 1) #JomTulisTesis. Diakses pada Januari 7, 2021 melalui pautan https://youtu.be/6bANk-CrrhI 

Saya sudah subscribe! Anda bila lagi☺☺☺

KERJA KUMPULAN:

Gambar Bukti Kehadiran Minggu 11